![]() |
6505 W. Park, Suite 306-335 |
| Home | About Pinnacle | Articles | Clients | Lean | Strategic Planning | Six Sigma | Theory of Constraints | Training | Supply Chain Management | Contact Us | |
|
|
Brown Fintube ToC initiative gets dramatic results in just 90 daysBy John Rosso and Ernest McAnally This article is a frank account of a recent initiative at Brown Fintube There was no doubt that improvements were needed at Brown Fintube. No systematic method of planning or scheduling was in place and jobs were accepted without regard to capacity or loading. Consequently, we were not able to accurately predict shipment dates for contracts and never knew when a job was going to be late until it was late. Our on-time delivery performance to meet original promise dates was dismal (in the low 40% range). Designs and drawings were too often late getting to the shop because we were unable to provide Mechanical Engineering and Drafting with meaningful due dates. There was confusion on the shop floor about how to prioritize jobs. In order to compensate for problems and still attempt to meet ship dates, overtime and intense expediting was necessary. Each month began from scratch. By the end of the month, the floor was clean and there was no new work in progress.
We were aware of ToC and thought it held promise, but realized there much was much to do before we could harness it successfully. We decided to cultivate a clear understanding of ToC among Brown Fintube personnel and develop an effective methodology for applying it. We were still uncertain on how to apply ToC to our business because most texts on the subject addressed machine shops and our business consists of fabrication and welding with some assembly. The difference is not trivial; capacity at most machine shops is based on machine availability and our capacity is based on labor skill availability. We researched whether or not ToC — based scheduling software could help our business by discussing it with others who had implemented it. Each of them confirmed our original thinking - they advised us not to implement the software without first establishing a thorough organizational understanding of ToC. They also strongly advised us to use DBR manually before moving to the software phase. Pinnacle Manufacturing Consulting (now Pinnacle Strategies) was recommended to us as a capable and well-respected implementer of ToC. We met with Pinnacle's president, Mark Woeppel, and together, we devised a plan for implementation of Drum Buffer Rope scheduling for our shop.Our implementation was not intended to be just a "shop" solution; The PlanPinnacle set the implementation in motion immediately, focusing the first group of changes where the greatest impact could be achieved. The idea behind the implementation was to gain control of operations in increments of time. First, a few days were controlled, then a week, then a month. Finally, an implementation of a medium-range sales and operations planning process that would manage the next several months after that, was established. First, Pinnacle trained Brown Fintube employees in ToC concepts. Every shop floor employee was given an introduction, as were engineers, project managers, and key support people. Once training was complete, our shop supervisors were excited and dedicated to making the implementation a success. The most significant step towards bringing production under control came with the introduction of a full time scheduler. The scheduler has responsibility for generating the production schedule, handling day-to-day reconciliation of demand to capacity, promising deliveries and overseeing the components (released and unreleased manufacturing orders) of schedule execution. Although controversial at the time, by giving responsibility and accountability to a single person, premature release of materials into the shop was prevented, halting misallocation of capacity and preventing late arrival of components to the constraint. We selected a drum (constraint) resource and created a workable, daily schedule. This step was significant because the decision making processes for the entire company would now center on this resource. No capacity, sales, or order delivery decisions would be made, from this point forward, without considering their impact on this resource. To formalize the decision, procedures and policies were written and people were trained how to apply them. One of the tools created was the "lead time report." This report from the scheduler gave Sales a tool to accurately promise customer deliveries. We then separated normal process variation from unnecessary variation (that had been introduced by lack of plant synchronization). Unwanted fluctuations were compensated for Daily "buffer management" meetings were initiated to synchronize the different departments; paying sharp attention to the constraint and to what orders were shipping - two of the most important factors in operations. This process ensured that the constraint resource always had at least a one-day queue of parts from which to work, thereby eliminating month end spikes in shipments and leveling our shipping rates. It also served to smooth out the flow of work in the plant by reducing spikes in capacity load. On-time delivery started improving immediately. Within 90 days, Brown Fintube improved on-time delivery performance from 40% to more than 90%, and since February 2002, we have consistently performed on time at or above 95%. We felt we were better organized as a result of systematically planning business activity. Our first two goals were fully accomplished and proved to be an unqualified success. Our accuracy in predicting monthly revenue is now very high. Our accuracy in the area of "available to promise" is close to 100%. Revenue has increased while the number of direct labor employees has declined (through attrition) and it has been unnecessary to replace them. Over the last 18 months, our average annual revenue per shop employee has increased $72,000. Moving Toward Strategic Decision Making
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2008 Pinnacle Strategies | |